I had the idea that it would be wonderful to be a physicist or a mathematician maybe 500 years ago around the time of Newton when there were really fundamental things just lying around to be discovered.
A poor life this if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare.
What does it mean, exactly, for a given system to be a ‘neural correlate of consciousness’?
Although I’m Australian, I find myself much more in sympathy with the Austrian version!
If you want to annoy your neighbors, tell the truth about them.
I think that consciousness has always been the most important topic in the philosophy of mind, and one of the most important topics in cognitive science as a whole, but it had been surprisingly neglected in recent years.
Anyway, there is a lot of really interesting work going on in the neuroscience and psychology of consciousness, and I would love to see philosophers become more closely involved with this.