If even in science there is no a way of judging a theory but by assessing the number, faith and vocal energy of its supporters, then this must be even more so in the social sciences: truth lies in power.
Category Archive: Imre Lakatos
Research programmes, besides their negative heuristic, are also characterized by their positive heuristic.
Philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind.
The positive heuristic of the programme saves the scientist from becoming confused by the ocean of anomalies.
The classical example of a successful research programme is Newton’s gravitational theory: possibly the most successful research programme ever.
Our empirical criterion for a series of theories is that it should produce new facts. The idea of growth and the concept of empirical character are soldered into one.
The clash between Popper and Kuhn is not about a mere technical point in epistemology.
Blind commitment to a theory is not an intellectual virtue: it is an intellectual crime.
There is no falsification before the emergence of a better theory.
It would be wrong to assume that one must stay with a research programme until it has exhausted all its heuristic power, that one must not introduce a rival programme before everybody agrees that the point of degeneration has probably been reached.